Welcome
Welcome to physicsdiscussionforum

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. In addition, registered members also see less advertisements. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!

Nuclear Physics brings Alchemy back

Nuclear Physics brings Alchemy back

Postby NonGrataEngineering » Sun Jun 25, 2017 2:33 am

From time to time I am having a little fun asking people two questions. Is it possible to achieve what alchemists wanted - lead to gold transformation? Everyone gives me a right answer: "go to hell" or "hell no, don’t you go to school, alchemy was a pseudoscience"

Then I ask a second question. Is it possible to get one periodic element from another? Most of the people do not fully understand the meaning but some give the right answer - "Yes, it is called nuclear reaction" and almost immediately come to realisation - it was the same question asked twice. Lead and gold are both metals, both from periodic table.

According to both Bohr’s atomic and quantum mechanical models, the difference between lead and gold is three protons in atom nucleus. If we remove those extra protons from lead nucleus we get an atom of gold and some energy. Unfortunately we do not have the know-how to exercise that kind of control, yet.

I don’t think that synthetic gold will be financially feasible, but we are already running short of some rear earth metals, that shortage holds back our technological advance. Alchemy also, can be a good alternative or supplement to asteroid mining …
User avatar
NonGrataEngineering
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2017 12:08 am

 

Re: Nuclear Physics brings Alchemy back

Postby JohnDuffield » Sun Jul 30, 2017 2:21 pm

Sadly it's easier to turn gold into lead:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_t ... rn_physics

Alchemy wasn't pseudoscience, it was the forerunner of chemistry.
JohnDuffield
Site Admin
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 5:01 pm


Return to Energy and Mass

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

suspicion-preferred